Huffington Post Divorce: Storage and Letting Go

Editor’s note: This post originally appeared on The Huffington Post’s new Divorce section as part of our regular contributions to their site. Keep checking back for more Sudden Bachelor on Huff Post.

I met my ex at the storage room last week. I took away a lesson in letting go.

The storage room is in a nondescript concrete structure in Yonkers, and until last Saturday held the remaining detritus of my marriage and some archeological evidence of life before that.  I met my ex in front.

We proceeded to the room through a chilly labyrinth of corridors lined with rooms just like ours. My somewhat morbid thought: there are lives condensed into each of these cubicles, kind of like rows of drawers in a crematorium.

The clanging of the storage room door opening echoed down the corridor as we talked studiously of neutral things, like Melissa’s daughter/ my stepdaughter and her travails at her new school.  Once in the room, we quickly decided which furniture would stay or go: none for me, I was already jammed into an apartment half the size of the house we had lived in. She would take the Mies chairs, notwithstanding their total dilapidation.

After the junk guy joined us and moved some furniture, Melissa and I started digging out and opening the boxes. I picked through the toys in the first box and noticed at the bottom some Hot Wheels tracks- the ones my son and I played with for hours and hours well before I knew Melissa. There was also some artwork, paintings which unintentionally looked like abstracts, a therapist’s dream image of a very little stick figure kid and looming parents on either side, pieces of cardboard with things like buttons and feathers pasted to them. Melissa and I laughed when we could not figure out which kid did what and also how the stuff had stayed pasted to the cardboard for so long!

I shut the boxes. There were no tears or anything, no Citizen Kane moment.  The junk man asked, junk? I nodded yes.

The rest of the room was jammed floor to ceiling with furniture which we and the junk man removed, dolly load by dolly load, until the chairs were in Melissa’s car and the rest of the furniture down near his pickup truck.  It was when Melissa was gone and the junk man was breaking up the final sticks of furniture with a crowbar so they would fit in the truck, that I thought about storage and letting go.

I arrived home feeling a bit liberated, telling my girlfriend that the storage room was cleared, ready to accept her many boxes shipped from across the country.   During the rest of the day though, a lingering question echoed in my head: what had happened during the preceding decades the skeletal remains of which ended up deposited in that room to leave me in this kind of pleasantly numb, more expectant than mournful, state?  And in that state, what could I take from the wreckage of the lives I had led, to move forward into this cool clear fall Sunday with some pinprick of light to shed on the fallout from the failed relationships that led me here?

It was amazing how easily the furniture all came apart, the crowbar went through it all like butter, it had looked so- durable! So many dinners on that table, so many books, stereo equipment, TV lodged in the bookshelf unit for years Maybe it was that, how easily all this furniture freighted with years of use and meaning came apart coaxed by the crowbar, that flagged for me that letting go is the easiest and hardest part of marriage and divorce.

We tend to keep grievances and expectations boxed up within like we keep things in storage.  You could call it- baggage.  We take it from our childhood to our relationships, then from relationship to relationship, we open those boxes in every therapy session until we might as well play a tape recording.  What is so hard about letting go?  Isn’t all we need a crowbar?

There’s Life After Divorce – BlogTalkRadio.com

Love Bites For Lover’s Only BlogTalk Radio is excited to have had guest Mark Schwartz, Co- Founder Sudden Bachelor.com, on the show. Mark shared his bachelor secrets with Radio-Host Candace Chambers Belida. Is there life after divorce? Listen below:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/btrplayer.swf?file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2Flovebitesforloversonly%2Fplay_list.xml&autostart=false&bufferlength=5&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/flashplayercallback.aspx

Listen to internet radio with MyCandace on Blog Talk Radio

Legal Beat: When Custody Battles Turn Deadly

Editor’s note: Check out Vikki on The Huffington Post Divorce section.

Hunting for three beautiful boys whose parents were in a nasty custody battle can turn deadly.

The Michigan police chief Larry Weeks is heading the investigation for three brothers who have been missing since Thanksgiving. The boys’ father, John Skelton, has been arrested and is being held in an Ohio prison on three counts of parental kidnapping. Because he was arrested in Ohio, he will face an extradition hearing to be returned to Michigan, Weeks said.

The three boys were last seen last Thursday on Thanksgiving in the backyard of their father’s southern Michigan home, about 12 miles from the Ohio-Michigan border.

The boys’ father was in an Ohio hospital for several days receiving treatment for “mental health issues” after telling police he tried to hang himself, Weeks said. As soon as he was released he was arrested for kidnapping his own three sons.

Skelton originally told police that he gave his sons to a woman he met on the Internet so she could bring them to their mother, Tanya Skelton. However, the police have determined that Skelton lied about the woman he supposedly gave his sons to and they do not believe she exists, according to WBNS.

The police chief said Skelton is providing some information to investigators, but not all of it is credible, and they are not sure what to believe.

When his wife filed for divorce in September, the father of the three boys picked two of them up from school early and drove out of state. On Sept. 13, he packed his two oldest sons in the family van and drove to nearby Ohio only to return and then take off with them again to Florida.

It was the start of a nasty custody battle and possible precursor to all three boys’ disappearance last week before their dad’s suicide attempt.

Circuit Judge Margaret Noe told The Associated Press that Tanya Skelton received exclusive custody after John Skelton returned from Florida with the boys, but the couple subsequently negotiated an agreement that allowed visitation.

“The agreement was without my intervention,” Noe said. “It is not unusual for judges to encourage parents to engage in agreements between themselves relative to visitation because they best know the circumstances.”

After John Skelton returned the boys from Florida he had been seeing them “with no issues,” said Kathye Herrera, who identified herself as a spokeswoman for Tanya Skelton.

Tanya Skelton said in a motion filed the same day as the divorce complaint that John Skelton’s work as a truck driver kept him “on the road for weeks at a time.” When he is home it’s for a maximum of “two to three days at a time,” she claimed and could not care for the children as the primary parent.

John Skelton filed a motion for custody on Sept. 27, saying his wife was a registered sex offender and was unfit to parent their three children.

The question here is: why did this happen? Custody battles are often acrimonious and ugly with both sides feeling down and out. But it is never an option to hide children from the other parent or even worse harm them. Courts of equity always review custody cases and make informed decisions with mental health professionals.

Here, in this case, both parents “agreed” on a parenting schedule where they would both see the children and continue to regularly parent. What went wrong? Why did this father feel so desperate that he may have done the unthinkable? Had he undergone therapy would he have learned to cope with the divorce and financial ruin? Would he have been able to cope not living under the same roof with the children on a daily basis? Did he cry out for help since the inception of the divorce proceeding?

Using your children as a pawn is never the answer. These beautiful boys deserved to be loved by both parents. We pray for the safe return of the Skelton boys and pray that no one ever takes a custodial dispute into their own hands. Remember, the test is always the best interest of the children not the parents.

Huffington Post Divorce: Capital, Marriage and Divorce

Editor’s note: This post originally appeared on The Huffington Post’s new Divorce section as part of our regular contributions to their site. Keep checking back for more Sudden Bachelor on Huff Post.

We live in a particularly capital-focused era. As capital rushes to the top 1 percent and drains from the remaining 99-ers, as our government printing press works overtime to inject capital into a still-damaged financial system, as we salivate over lifestyles of the rich and famous while clinging to our ever more embattled jobs- capital arguably rules our consciousness. But capital is more than money.

The potentially record-breaking several billion-dollar divorce payout rumored to be in the offing for Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev to his wife prompted these thoughts about capital, marriage and divorce.

The news is replete with big money divorce stories: Tiger and Elin’s $110 million settlement, the reputed $450 million or so Mel Gibson paid to be free to bring on the crazy in his life, Charlie Sheen (not yet quantifiable but on the boards for 8 figures or more for sure…). Huge chunks of capital change hands in the interest of freedom, revenge, lawyer enrichment, even fairness, all drivers of divorce. But lately I think of capital in a different way, courtesy of my marital and divorce experiences and time of life.

Ben Franklin reputedly said time is money. I would amend that to say: time is capital and capital is time. And a key form of capital is the quality of the minutes we are given. And- finally to the point — toward the end of my second marriage, I found myself thinking about capital in relationship terms. In other words, relationships have capital.

My second marriage was contentious. Despite relationship therapy then marital therapy, supplemented by individual therapists for parents and kids all around, cluster-therapy you might call it, we couldn’t get past the constant fights which were like a hydra-headed monster. I couldn’t help thinking toward the end, we are spending our capital on fighting and I didn’t mean therapist bills (not to belittle those). The trauma of the constant flareups and then prolonged cool-downs chipped away, I see in hindsight, at the emotional reservoir, the warmth and trust, that are the backbone of a good relationship. Finally, the positive capital was drained and legal euthanasia ensued.

If my ex and I had had the foresight to see the Pyrrhic nature of each fight, could we have stanched the outflow of relationship capital? Maybe. Or, maybe we were just incompatible and should have bitten the bullet a lot earlier instead of spending massive emotional capital trying to jerrybuild our lives together.

On the flip side, when it comes to divorce, capital also has a dual meaning. In traditional divorce, financial and mental capital are too-often severely depleted. It’s just a variant of what I experienced in a contentious marriage. If you come out swinging in divorce, perhaps fueled by the worst emotions of lawyers and clients: avarice, jealousy, hatred, tainted love — you are forced to invest and ultimately lose hunks of emotional and financial capital. At the upper echelons of society this is what hits the tabloids, pitched battles ending in 8 or 9, or even 10 (!) figure settlements the amounts of which, I honestly believe, do not match the emotional devastation wreaked on people we think we envy.

What if, as we enter our next marriage or longterm relationship, we are able to pay attention to the emotional “capital” in it, with a view to preserving and growing it like we try to grow our IRAs? And what if, when we end up in the clutches of the legal system getting divorced, instead of coming out swinging we approach it with a view to preserving as much emotional capital of everybody involved as we can? Would we be able to sacrifice conflict for concord?

Kind of goes against human nature dunnit? Maybe so, but sometimes, a mere intention is worth a thousand words.

Holiday Shopping Guide For Sudden Bachelors

The holiday season is upon us. For many, these are happy times, but for many Sudden Bachelors these times can be depressing and daunting. But let’s focus on the positive. For some of you Sudden Bachelors – you might already be back in the dating mix and you might have a new special someone. Since this is all new territory, you are probably unsure of what kind of holiday gift to get this new lover of yours. Our friends over at Urblife.com have a few ideas of what to give and what NOT to give – check out a few below and click here to see the whole list.

An unexpected pregnancy. Nothing says “I love you” like the surprise of a new mouth to feed.

$25 Applebee’s gift card. Try the artichoke dip.

A refurbished merkin wig. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Pleasures of the flesh. Not just for birthdays anymore.

Huffington Post Divorce: Midlife Madness

Editor’s note: This post originally appeared on The Huffington Post’s new Divorce section as part of our new regular contributions to their site. Keep checking back for more Sudden Bachelor on Huff Post.

Midlife crisis is a cliché, unless you’re living through it.  And midlife divorce is also a cliché, though I don’t know that we automatically think of it that way.

For my midlife crisis I quit my job, moved my family to Newport, and then ultimately separated from my wife.

The emotional and financial costs of these events are very much with me today.  Is it madness to throw everything up in the air in midlife?  From a helicopter view, sure.  But since I spend so much time on suddenbachelor.com talking about divorce, instead I’m going to take a few steps backward to question the answers on marriage itself (not knowing the answers myself, mind you).  A couple of threshold questions:

  • Marriage should be forever- T or F?  True of course.  That is, if we end up on the right side of the damning divorce statistics, the successful 50%.  In other words, marriage works forever if the coin flip goes in our favor.  The case for F?  When it doesn’t work, the consequences are dire.  Lives ripped apart, lawyers enriched, kids put in a world of pain and uncertainty, surgery conducted on people’s lives with the butter knife of a cumbersome, outdated, antagonistic and self-interested legal system.
  • Alternative?  Isn’t there a movie where at the end they have a not-getting-married ceremony?  Is it possible to have and expect, even plan for, different committed relationships for different times of your life, to admit it’s not one size fits all seasons, the same way career changes can be made to accommodate life or economic changes?

As a child of the afterglow of the 60s, I fully recognize that “free love” and all that is mostly silly and counter to human nature. It was great to be revolutionary as long as my parents were paying for the accessories.  But to every wrongheaded ideology there is sometimes a seed of truth.  And really good music.  Here’s a quote from Jefferson Airplane: Life is change, how it differs from the rocks.

As a child of that 60s afterglow, I am old enough (sigh) to know that many of our most critical decisions are made under the influence, if not of drugs (weddings in Vegas anyone?), then their emotional equivalent i.e. love, and dreams about marriage.  Long after the death of the 60s I have been made aware through the wrenching, heartbreaking, nearly bankrupting experiences of my not one but two midlives (I’m sparing you the second), that our waking-dream expectations of marriage often do not bear out in the harsh light of day.

The concept that with the donning of the rings a couple is branded as each-other’s permanent exclusive property- that concept is belied by the infidelities and divorces emblazoned on the front pages of the rags lining every supermarket checkout counter.  Yet, in love we cannot imagine nor tolerate anything but forever.  To me now, love is an evolutionary imperative, a Darwinian addiction which went just a little overboard.